Lately I've been thinking even more than
usual about my own judgement -- at least some of which is, to put it charitably, ad hoc. I'm a paid expert on the subject of money, who hasn't
had a meaningful insight into shrewd financial decision-making more than
a few times in his whole life. I am profoundly, sometimes astonishingly
klutzy. I take insufficient care of myself (in much the same way that
there is insufficient peace in the Middle East, I suppose). I have had
arguments that make very little sense.
There would've been a time when I'd have said these things with shame,
or frustration, or self-loathing, but these days it feels something more
like entertaining: as if I had a free subscription to a 3D sitcom in
which the irregularly competent hero with the tourette's syndrome of the hands is played by someone who looks and talks and falls down
a lot like I do. If nothing else, it has made for a lot of
unanticipated stimuli. There's really only one major decision-making tool I've perfected, but lucky for
me it's been a pretty doggone important one, too: My entire life, going back to early
childhood, I've always made it a point to have a project.
Like all great choices in this realm, mine was not entirely up to me
at least at first. When I was little the projects mostly involved
building things out of Legos. Beginning at age five or six, I spent the
summers with my wistful and long-suffering grandparents, whose
rural-Indiana parenting skills left them ill-prepared for the travails
of surrogate parenting the precocious son of an IBM'er they didn't like:
A perfect little Mini-Me of the fella who'd conned their daughter with
big talk of an aristocratic background, and promptly dumped her with few
resources and a young child.
To my grandparents' abiding credit they
never once spoke ill of my father, or evidenced resentment of my
carbon-copy diction, to even the tiniest degree. For weeks on end I
paraded myself up and down the tiled runway leading from their kitchen
to their living room, pronouncing on everything from Presidential
politics to the state of the art in corn weevil prevention, all without
having the slightest idea what I was talking about or even, a lot of the
time, exactly what I was saying. One has no difficulty at all imagining
the two of them, on a typically raucous afternoon in my fourth year,
turning to each other and saying, "We've got to get this kid something
to *do*."
From that moment on, and for the next eleven summers, all I had to do
was mutter under my breath about how nice it would be to have the next,
bigger, more elaborate, more expensive Lego set, and it would seem to
fall out of a Crawfordsville summer shower, thence to pollute my
grandparents' carpet as efficiently as I had been polluting their
brains. In the beginning my Grandfather still worked at R.R. Donnelley
and Sons, leaving every morning to a waving party by my grandma and me
that would have been more appropriate to his departure for the Eastern
Front.
Thus it was that the Lego projects I visualized for myself were
of the sort that could be completed in a single day: The combine
harvester with the stair-stepped Lego bricks to simulate the corn head.
The DC-9 on which I'd flown unaccompanied from LaGuardia to Indianapolis
to get there. A chair lift for the "ski area" that I'd improvised by
wadding my grandmother's favorite white afghan into a cone-shaped ball,
arranged perilously near my grandfather's un-emptied ashtray. In those
days, if you couldn't finish it before he came back from Donnelley's in
the evening, it wasn't worth building.
Had my grandfather been ten years younger when I was born (which
would admittedly have been a neat trick, given the age he actually was),
I'm not sure what would have become of my project-gland as I aged out
of being interested in single-day, imagination-based projects built from
Legos. Instead, on more or less the exact day that a six-hour stint on
the living room rug no longer felt like much of a challenge to me, he
retired, leaving me abruptly with flimsy midday excuses for how little
value I was planning still to add to the pieces in the box. If I was to
continue to impress -- if I was to continue to play this approval-driven
game I'd grown so preternaturally fixated on -- I was going to have to
step things up.
Enter Dave's Childhood 2.0, then, during which the Lego projects took
whole weeks, whole months, eventually a whole summer to complete, and
which were so vastly more elaborate that they could not be visually
understood by anyone strolling past them before they were finished.
Mostly this involved continually building and re-building the national
capital city of a fictitious republic I'd formed inside my head -- in
response to a budding companion interest in the passions and rancor of
electoral politics.
To be more accurate about it the city was actually a
metroplex of five cities that had grown together into an unwieldy
sprawl of expressways and corporate campuses and sports facilities,
comprising DiAblo, East DiAblo, Garrison, Garfield, and Branjard (the J
is silent). From my eleventh year until my embarrassingly late teens the
people of "The Greater Corridor" argued intensely but always in
good-faith about everything from the closing of the original and
much-loved airport, D-I-A (and the development-tilting site of its
unseemly new replacement, E-D-I), to whether or not the people of
Garfield should have to pay the millage on DiAblo's spaceship-like
football stadium, despite having long ago been granted an expansion team
of their own. All beneath my benevolent, Lego-encrusted hand. There
were scandals and controversies; triumphs of community spirit and
heart-rending tragedies, and there was always, always, *always* a giant,
booming FM-radio station filled up mostly with the sounds of a young
IBM kid making burp and fart noises into a tape recorder.
I'm digressing here, but it seems appropriate to admit that The
Greater Corridor has never quite left me. I don't play with Legos
anymore, but every now and then with no premeditation I catch myself
likening a real-world place to one of the recurring Lego features of
that fractious and chaotic living-room world. The Pierre Elliot Trudeau
International Airport in Montreal, is E-D-I. By which I do not mean that
the two places shared the same architect; I don't mean that one design
inspired the other; I mean that it *is* the East DiAblo International
Airport, on some curiously unsinkable little circuit inside my otherwise
grown-up head. (And yes, in the end, the discourse-loving peoples of
the corridor came to love the new airport and adopt it as their own,
thanks in no small part to an ingenius initiative to turn the grand old gal
downtown into a juried artists' colony with periodic multimedia
exhibitions in the great open spaces where planes used to taxi and take
off. I knew you'd want to know.)
There is much to say about how all of this reflected on me then, and
how it perhaps informs many of the unusual behavior patterns that my
long-suffering friends have been asked to put up with, now. There's an
essay in here someplace about loneliness vs. alone-ness. There's one
about approval vs. affection. There's probably even -- let's be honest
-- one about early-onset megalomania. None of those, however, are *this*
essay. This essay is about having a project. For all that was
different, or queer, or even unsettling about the way I spun-out those
summers, I was to my certain knowledge the only kid in that entire part
of Montgomery County who never, once, said, "I'm bored: there's nothing
to do." When the other kids in the neighborhood got bored (or, more
often, when they got boring), it was only for me to adjourn on a thin
pretext to the completion of the second parking garage at The Zenith,
and a spirited interview of the Garrison Invaders' head coach, on what
the new facility would mean for the team's cautious fan support. When
others were bored, I had a project. It's self-serving to put it that way
but it's also true.
These days the projects are all written, and the approval is either
distant, improbable, empty, or some combination thereof. But the main
idea is the same. Grown-ups don't say, "I'm bored: there's nothing to
do," of course; what grown-ups say is, "Every Monday we get up and we
come to this place, and every Friday we go to Maxfield's and get tore
up: what's it all *for*???" And friends, I don't do that either. It's
self-serving to put it that way, but it's also true. I pay for an office
that is distinct from the one I get paid for going to, and in that
rented office, I pursue large, unwieldy projects -- written instead of
made from Legos, but otherwise not all that different, really. Close
friends sometimes question my appetite for complexity in these matters,
but if I've accomplished nothing else with this story I hope I've made
it clear that I wouldn't know how to begin tackling something that
wasn't so messy and complicated that it was just about to topple from my
grandparents' glass-top coffee table. It just wouldn't be in my
training.
You will have noticed that this is not much of an ethos. If I have a
son someday, and he comes to me at age seven and says, "Daddy, I'm
bored: there's nothing to do," I will stare at him over the top of my
New Yorker for a long, loving moment and say, "Have a project." If I
have a daughter someday and she comes to me and says, "Daddy, the
neighbors are moving to Ann Arbor and I'm about to lose my best friend,"
I will stare at her over the top of my New Yorker for a long, loving
moment and say, "Have a project." If my son comes to me at age fifteen
and says, "The guys down the street have been cruel to animals," I will
say, "Make ending it into a project." If my daughter comes to me at age
eighteen and says, "All this school! What's it really supposed to do for
me, anyway," I will say, "Have you tried considering it as a project?"
When they get tired of this mantra, as all children eventually tire
of their parents' mantras, there won't be much else for me to offer
instead. I won't be the person they come to for money advice (God
willing), or relationship advice (ditto), or advice on how to shop for
stereo equipment, or cut a board with a radial arm saw, or fight a
traffic ticket, or handle a tense disagreement with a friend (ditto,
ditto, ditto, ditto). In telling them to have a project, and to use that
project as their impetus for putting one foot contentedly in front of
the other, I will be sharing with them the sum and substance of the
wisdom I've accumulated over all these years of ad hoc judgement. It's not hard to imagine a moment -- one of the many in which I'd just
dispensed this very same wisdom to a son or daughter for the fiftieth
time -- in which I'm being greeted with a sort of open-mouth,
hand-on-top-of-the-head flavor of indignation, and finding myself only
able to shrug a sheepish grin and add, "Well, that's all I got; sorry.
Have a project."
My project is to get a book published. Got one too?
Dave O'Gorman
("The Key Grip")
Gainesville, Florida
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Yeah, Well, That's All I Got; Sorry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment